Thursday, October 29, 2009

Cambridge University in 'totty' row

An online "redtop" called The Tab was launched this year and received 80,000 hits in its first week.
But a section where students pose in their underwear has caused controversy and led to calls for the scantilly clad students to be covered up.

The Cambridge student union women's officer, Natalie Szarek, said that they should be removed because they “reproduce and reinforce harmful attitudes towards women”.
Miss Szarek complained that “semi-naked women in provocative positions are being shoved in freshers' faces”, adding: “We can do better as a university”.
Meanwhile one of the student models, who posed on a punt in a small pink bikini and high heels, requested her photos removed from the site.

Becky Adams was said to have been “embarrassed” by the fall out of appearing in the tabloid and said she had only done it “as a favour for a friend”.
Until yesterday a picture of her accompanied an article headlined “Bra-vo” – a piece about a study which found that Cambridge women have on average the ninth largest bra sizes in the UK.
She was replaced by a picture of a large blue bra, without a woman attached.
Taymoor Atighetchi, 21, a third-year student at Trinity College and one of the tabloid’s three co-founders who paid £500 each to launch the website, defended The Tab and said it would continue its style of journalism.
"There's a huge amount of intellectual snobbery around, mainly from those who haven't read the site," he said.

"We do not think what we are doing is sexist. It was always the intention to have a debate about these issues. The website is a tongue-in-cheek version of the tabloid newspaper - we are not just emulating it."
Editorials in the tabloid have hit back at Miss Szarek, and highlighted her arrest at a recent protest. The Tab called the student union a "sad dinosaur" that needs to "die or be cut back".

Meanwhile, the website has maintained its redtop coverage with another recent feature about “size 12 stunner” Emmalina Thompsell, a student at Gonville and Caius College, who has reached the final of Miss East Anglia competition.
The latest “Tab Totty” to takle part in a photoshoot was a girl called Heidi, who wrote a comment piece to go with pictures of herself in gym wear.
“I’d like to see myself as someone with brainpower and boobs, a pairing which I feel Cambridge culture strives to deny,” she said.

The female photographer who took the “Totty” photos also defended the website and said that six senior women staff are all proud to work for The Tab”.
“As a female who works on the Tab editorial team and a feminist, I’m delighted that so much debate has been generated over the Tab Totty section," she said. "The main aim of The Tab was always to stimulate debate, and I feel we have truly succeeded when it comes to the issue of Page Three modelling."

She added that none of the student models had been exploited.
"Surely the fact that they are educated and bright women, and still chose to partake in Tab Totty proves that ‘page three’ and ‘glamour girls’ are not just women who have no other choice but to turn to modelling.”
The website has also come into conflict with Cambridge’s traditional old student newspapers, Varsity and The Cambridge Student.
Although its hits have fallen to 50,000 last week, The Tab says it is the most read student publication in Cambridge.

Mr Atighetchi said that the papers have lost readers and hundreds of copies are left untouched at every college.
"Students want news quickly and they want it to be entertaining – they get enough essays already," he said.

The Varsity co-editor, Anna Trench, a third-year English student, disagreed, claiming the traditional press is "taken a lot more seriously" and that the anti-elitist Tab was run by "three of the richest students in Cambridge".

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Nick Griffin has 'hijacked' Christianity, says Lord Carey

Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, has said it was "chilling" to hear Nick Griffin claim to represent "Christian Britain" in his appearance on Question Time, as he accused the BNP leader of trying to "hijack one of the world's great religions".

Lord Carey of Clifton called on Christians to "stand shoulder to shoulder" in rejecting the British National Party and its leader Mr Griffin, whom he described as a "squalid racist".

Calling the BBC's invitation to the far-right leader “a mistake”, Lord Carey said: 'The BBC's director-general errs in arguing that in a democracy all views should be heard.

'The views of the BNP are not simply false, they are dangerous, indeed irredeemably evil,” he told the News of the World.

He added: “All Christians [should] stand shoulder-to-shoulder in rejection of Nick Griffin's notion that 'Christianity' has anything to do with his despicable views.”

During his appearance on Thursday, Mr Griffin said if Muslims wanted to remain in Britain they had to accept that it was “a fundamentally British and Christian country”.

Shadow foreign secretary William Hague said the broadcast allowed voters to see "what a hateful party (the BNP) is and that it is not the way forward for our country".

Madhur’s toughest part in real life

I just don’t believe in remaking South Indian Films with an ease. My films strictly attach to realms of reality,” said Madhur Bhandarkar. It all happened during an interaction with media channels as journalists questioned about his prototyped flicks.

Well, it was a jocular statement to heed over a journalist saying, “Yeah! He doesn’t remake the films, but remakes the news channels into fictional shows.”

Of course, it’s a laudable statement with Madhur Bhandarkar letting his hand on experimenting with various segments of societal crises. The filmmaker is rigidly attempting for yet another trilogy after completing – ‘Traffic Signal’, ‘Corporate’ & ‘Page 3’.

With ‘Fashion’ and ‘Jail’, Madhur has got a single flick to tot up with a series. Perhaps, he has got a different idea as he says, “Nowadays, it’s really turning out to be a speculative situation as I am always kept on the track. I just had to visit my friend hospital and I was just appalled to get a buzz – Madhur’s next film on ‘Hospital’, he’s onto the research by making secret visits.”

Madhur Bhandarkar Says Jail Is Watchable For All Age Groups

Frontal nudity by lead actor Neil Nitin Mukesh in his new film ‘Jail’ made headlines, but filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar now says he has blurred the scenes so as to make it watchable for all age groups.

"The film will shake up a lot of people and give a perspective to the common man who has never gone inside a jail. That is also the reason I wanted a U/A certificate for the film, as I want all age groups to watch the film," Bhandarkar told.
"I have also moderated the swear words in it for the same reason and have blurred Neil's frontal nudity so that the film becomes commonly visible," he added.
Despite controversies surrounding the film courtesy Neil's complete peel-off for his character, Bhandarkar's Jail has got a universal adult certificate for the masses.

He also denies making reality-based films to win National Awards.
"Awards do give one a sense of encouragement and a feeling of achievement. But I don't make films to win a National Award. As far as 'Jail' is concerned, it will depend on what the jury thinks. It is too premature to talk about it," said Bhandarkar.

"I am basically a very blessed person to have it all - critical acclaim, box office success as well as National Awards for my films. For me it's a great moment when my films are appreciated and I just want the same for this one too," added the director who won the honours for ‘Chandni Bar’, ‘Page 3’ and ‘Traffic Signal’.

Co-produced by Percept Picture Company and Bhandarkar Entertainment, ‘Jail’ is releasing on Nov 6. Mugdha Godse plays the female lead in the film that also has Manoj Bajpai in a pivotal role.
"'Jail' is a subject I really felt I should explore because this is something no one has touched earlier in Bollywood. In Indian films, jails have always been shown larger than life. NO one has thrown light on details like how it functions, etc," he said.

"The trigger for this film is middle-class man Parag Dixit - he lives with his mother, has a girlfriend, works in the corporate sector and has a good record, but how he gets stuck in the law. It can happen to anybody," said Bhandarkar whose last release ‘Fashion’ was a gold spinner at the box office.
Bhandarkar insists he chose ‘Jail’ as a subject to explore a new territory.
"I could have made a big movie after 'Fashion'. But I felt I should work on a subject that is in contrast to what I have done earlier, keeping in mind that my script will always dominate the subject and budget of my film," he said.

Like his earlier ventures, ‘Jail’ also led to strenuous research and observation.
"A huge amount of research went behind the film like around seven months of paper scanning, TV monitoring, meeting and interacting with people who have gone through the trauma of being in a jail.
"Every minute and basic detail as in how people stay in a jail, what happens to them, how a first time offender is frisked, their body language - everything was looked into for the film," he explained.
Bhandarkar also visited "three jails for the movie, namely Thane Jail in Mumbai, Yerawada Jail in Pune and Dehradun Jail" where he "observed the functioning of the whole system".
"I also took Neil with me to Thane jail. All the jail authorities cooperated with us considering the kind of information we got from them," said Bhandarkar.

But won't his cinematic revelation disturb the authorities and the inmates?
"Though 'Jail' is 70 percent fact and 30 percent fiction, it is not judgmental. I am not giving any message with the film; neither am I saying that the authorities or the inmates are right or wrong. The film shows the point of view of a lot of people through Neil's character," he said.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

'Dancing With the Stars' eliminates UFC champ Chuck Liddell; ex-Dallas Cowboy Michael Irvin survives

When it comes to "Dancing With The Stars," the Iceman goeth.
Mixed martial artist Chuck "Iceman" Liddell was eliminated Tuesday night from the popular ABC dancing competition, along with his professional dance partner Anna Trebunskaya.
Dancing the country two-step in jeans and a leather vest, the mohawked, tattooed Liddell seemed as comfortable on the dance floor as he did throughout the entire competition.

"Out of all the dances I've seen you do," judge
Carrie Ann Inaba said, "you definitely suited the two-step the best. I could see myself walking into a bar and seeing you two-stepping."
However, after scoring 17 points out of a possible 30, Liddell landed in the bottom two against singer Aaron Carter.

In an odd twist, while former Dallas Cowboys
wide receiver Michael Irvin and snowboarding champ Louie Vito tied for the week's worst voter scores - scoring 16 on the bolero and two-step, respectively - neither was in the bottom two.
Still, while the viewer voting was as deadly to Liddell as UFC nemesis Quinton "Rampage" Jackson, the "Iceman's" adjustment from the octagon to the ballroom made an impression on his professional partner.
"You made me so proud," Trebunskaya told Liddell.
With that pairing gone, 10 couples remain for next week's show, which will feature the Argentine tango and the paso doble, along with the Hustle, which will be featured in a group dance.

Cena-Nough?? An Inside Look At John Cena And His Chances Of Leaving Raw

He is the guy we (well, not me) love to hate. You cheer him; you boo him. Kids love him, girls adore him (sorry, Rob Base). He's John Cena and, like him or not, he is arguably the most controversial figure currently in WWE.
Cena is set to put his Raw career on the line in a match with WWE Champion Randy Orton at Bragging Rights. With all that is at stake, you can't help but wonder what will Cena's future be if he indeed loses to Orton.
One would have to think that if Cena is leaving Raw he has to be going to SmackDown!. There is absolutely no reason for him to go to ECW. The WWE has done some questionable things over the years, but the chances of them moving, arguably, their biggest star to their least watched show is slim to none.
So, for the sake of this article, we'll look at two possibilites: Cena staying on Raw or Cena moving to Smackdown!. We'll first examine Cena staying on Raw.
You can make the case that John Cena has done everything he possibly can on Raw. He's faced all of the top talent over and over and over again. It has to be the end of the road for Cena on Raw right? Not exactly....
If Cena indeed moves to SmackDown! that leaves Triple H and Shawn Michaels as the only two main event level faces on Raw. With Raw being as short as they are on main event level talent, can they afford to let Cena leave? Who takes his place? Do fans really want to see another Orton versus Triple H feud?
Sure, you can throw Shawn Michaels in a feud with Orton but who gets a shot after that? The chance the WWE had to push MVP to main event status has passed. Do you give Kofi Kingston a shot? Kofi is deserving of a chance but I don't feel he can really carry the WWE's flagship program as the top babyface. Not yet at least.
In theory, the WWE would have to move a top SmackDown! star to Raw to compensate for Cena leaving. Otherwise, we are going to be stuck with a heavy rotation of Orton versus Michaels/HHH.
On the flipside, the possiblity of Cena moving to SmackDown! gives him the potential for fresh, exciting new matchups.
I predicted on another wrestling site that Cena versus CM Punk could be a potential WrestleMania main event and Cena moving to SmackDown! could indeed set this up.


It would be really interesting to see how Punk would use his "straight edge" lifestyle to convince us how inadequate Cena is considering that Cena is supposed to be a "squeaky clean" character.
CM Punk has taken his character to another level and feuding with Cena would be the pinnacle and a great lead in to WrestleMania.
Of course, you also have the potential of Cena being the next man to step up and go after The Undertaker's undefeated Wrestlemania winning streak. He would actually pose a real threat to ending it.
Only a man with "Superman-like" abilities could enter the "darkside" and take out 'Taker.
Cena is that man and it could very well happen.
Then, of course, you have the potential of a Cena versus Batista feud. We got a little taste of it a couple of years ago at Summerslam but it was cut short when Cena had to have surgery.
Both men leave something to be desired in the ring, but matching up these two is a box office draw for the WWE.
So where does Cena end up?
If I had to base my decision on the pros and cons I just gave for Cena staying on Raw or going to SmackDown!, I would have to say he should stay on Raw.
Quite frankly, SmackDown! does not need Cena but Raw does.
SmackDown! is thriving with a great mixture of youth and veteran talent.
Raw is stuck in a rut with the guest host angle that is honestly getting old. Yes, people watch to see who the next guest host will be, but at some point you have get back to wrestling and producing quality WRESTLING programming.
John Cena is vital to Raw's success. Though he's a bit over the top, he's one of the few things Raw has to offer.

It would be an awful move to let him go to SmackDown! or ECW (no chance) without Raw getting something in return.